Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EMIWG/MembersCall-24-Mar-2010"

Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
= Face to Face meeting at EclipseCon 2010  =
 
= Face to Face meeting at EclipseCon 2010  =
 
 
 
  
 
== Attendees  ==
 
== Attendees  ==
Line 10: Line 7:
 
*Motorola (Christian Kurzke, Eric Cloninger, Ruth, Daniel Franco, Guilherme)  
 
*Motorola (Christian Kurzke, Eric Cloninger, Ruth, Daniel Franco, Guilherme)  
 
*Nokia (Ronnie King, Gorkem (lead ERCP), Warren Paul)  
 
*Nokia (Ronnie King, Gorkem (lead ERCP), Warren Paul)  
*RIM (Adam Abramski, Jon Dearden, Ken Wallis)
+
*RIM (Adam Abramski, Jon Dearden, Ken Wallis)  
 
*Symbian (Paul Beusterien)  
 
*Symbian (Paul Beusterien)  
*Eclipse Foundation (Ian, Doug Schaeffer)  
+
*Eclipse Foundation (Ian, Doug Schaeffer)
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
Project representatives:
  
Project representatives:
+
*MTJ: Christian Kurzke  
* MTJ: Christian Kurzke
+
*Sequoyah: Eric Cloninger  
* Sequoyah: Eric Cloninger
+
*CDT: Doug Schaeffer  
* CDT: Doug Schaeffer
+
*ERCP: Gorkem
* ERCP: Gorkem
+
  
 
= Agenda  =
 
= Agenda  =
Line 26: Line 24:
 
== Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)  ==
 
== Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)  ==
  
= Pulsar review of scope =
+
= Pulsar review of scope =
  
In the 2009 review, we had 3 main topics: MTJ, CDT and WebTooling, from which we accomplished the MTJ package.
+
In the 2009 review, we had 3 main topics: MTJ, CDT and WebTooling, from which we accomplished the MTJ package.  
  
Due to significant changes in the mobile landscape, we should refocus. maybe:
+
Due to significant changes in the mobile landscape, we should refocus. maybe:  
  
* Java (incl. J2ME, RIM, Android)
+
*Java (incl. J2ME, RIM, Android)  
* Native (Symbian, Android Native, Meego?)
+
*Native (Symbian, Android Native, Meego?)  
* Web (Symbian Web UI, etc.)
+
*Web (Symbian Web UI, etc.)
  
Ronnie: Should we maintain the focus of Pulsar on a "product".
+
Ronnie: Should we maintain the focus of Pulsar on a "product".  
  
DougS: proposed a new "mobile" Platform focused plugin fest.
+
DougS: proposed a new "mobile" Platform focused plugin fest.  
  
John D: What is our long-term goal, are we creating products or frameworks.
+
John D: What is our long-term goal, are we creating products or frameworks.  
  
Ian: Successful example: Eclipse "Team Provider" Framework
+
Ian: Successful example: Eclipse "Team Provider" Framework  
  
Ken: Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough. Pulsar should be more of a "portal"
+
Ken: Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough. Pulsar should be more of a "portal"  
  
EricC: Who creates a product?: RIM, not strongly branded bundled, and includes a update site.   Motodev Studio, installer & update site, Nokia: similar, branded tool.
+
EricC: Who creates a product?: RIM, not strongly branded bundled, and includes a update site. Motodev Studio, installer &amp; update site, Nokia: similar, branded tool.  
  
= Driving Commonality =
+
= Driving Commonality =
  
what would member companies want from Pulsar
+
what would member companies want from Pulsar  
  
Nokia: Interest in MTJ (for S40) and Native Symbian development. Also discussons with Meego.  
+
Nokia: Interest in MTJ (for S40) and Native Symbian development. Also discussons with Meego.  
* interest in Native, C++ development:
+
 
 +
* interest in Native, C++ development:  
 
** Project Build (signing, multiple targets),  
 
** Project Build (signing, multiple targets),  
 
** Discovery of devices (over BT, USB, wifi, etc),  
 
** Discovery of devices (over BT, USB, wifi, etc),  
** Publishing to developer portals
+
** Publishing to developer portals  
 
** tooling around Meego
 
** tooling around Meego
  
* MTJ
+
* MTJ  
 
** MIDP 3 support, which would include CDC support
 
** MIDP 3 support, which would include CDC support
  
Symbian Foundation:
+
Symbian Foundation:  
 +
 
 
* Native - similar to Nokia.
 
* Native - similar to Nokia.
  
* Web Tooling
+
* Web Tooling  
** Symbian is looking to fund development of a Web Development environment
+
** Symbian is looking to fund development of a Web Development environment  
 +
*** Chrominum based, support development cycle including packaging, deploy, debug, etc.
 +
** very cross platform.
 +
** Ian reached out to JIL (no interest) and BONDI (curious)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Sony Ericsson:
 +
 
 +
* currently doesnt have a branded product
 +
* interest to improve Android Tooling
 +
** e.g. Profiling, Code coverage, UI development
 +
 
 +
 
 +
RIM:
 +
 
 +
* Java
 +
**  J2ME+Rim
 +
 
 +
* Web
 +
** Widgets (packaged HTML/Javascript) packaging, deployment
 +
** First class application on device
 +
** shares packaging, signing, etc.
 +
** uses JSDT, XUL runner
 +
** has proprietary debugging protocol between JavaScript engine and IDE (emulator working, device planned)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Possible common features ==
 +
 
 +
* Possible SDK management
 +
* Signing
 +
* Common UI code/Frameworks for common tasks
 +
**  Could possibly be shared from WTP project, which already has abstractions / connectors to server infrastructure

Revision as of 14:05, 24 March 2010

Shortcuts
Home
Meetings
Mail Archive
Edit this menu

Face to Face meeting at EclipseCon 2010

Attendees

  • Motorola (Christian Kurzke, Eric Cloninger, Ruth, Daniel Franco, Guilherme)
  • Nokia (Ronnie King, Gorkem (lead ERCP), Warren Paul)
  • RIM (Adam Abramski, Jon Dearden, Ken Wallis)
  • Symbian (Paul Beusterien)
  • Eclipse Foundation (Ian, Doug Schaeffer)


Project representatives:

  • MTJ: Christian Kurzke
  • Sequoyah: Eric Cloninger
  • CDT: Doug Schaeffer
  • ERCP: Gorkem

Agenda

Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)

Pulsar review of scope

In the 2009 review, we had 3 main topics: MTJ, CDT and WebTooling, from which we accomplished the MTJ package.

Due to significant changes in the mobile landscape, we should refocus. maybe:

  • Java (incl. J2ME, RIM, Android)
  • Native (Symbian, Android Native, Meego?)
  • Web (Symbian Web UI, etc.)

Ronnie: Should we maintain the focus of Pulsar on a "product".

DougS: proposed a new "mobile" Platform focused plugin fest.

John D: What is our long-term goal, are we creating products or frameworks.

Ian: Successful example: Eclipse "Team Provider" Framework

Ken: Pulsar is solving a too "high level" problem, common code is not used enough. Pulsar should be more of a "portal"

EricC: Who creates a product?: RIM, not strongly branded bundled, and includes a update site. Motodev Studio, installer & update site, Nokia: similar, branded tool.

Driving Commonality

what would member companies want from Pulsar

Nokia: Interest in MTJ (for S40) and Native Symbian development. Also discussons with Meego.

  • interest in Native, C++ development:
    • Project Build (signing, multiple targets),
    • Discovery of devices (over BT, USB, wifi, etc),
    • Publishing to developer portals
    • tooling around Meego
  • MTJ
    • MIDP 3 support, which would include CDC support

Symbian Foundation:

  • Native - similar to Nokia.
  • Web Tooling
    • Symbian is looking to fund development of a Web Development environment
      • Chrominum based, support development cycle including packaging, deploy, debug, etc.
    • very cross platform.
    • Ian reached out to JIL (no interest) and BONDI (curious)


Sony Ericsson:

  • currently doesnt have a branded product
  • interest to improve Android Tooling
    • e.g. Profiling, Code coverage, UI development


RIM:

  • Java
    • J2ME+Rim
  • Web
    • Widgets (packaged HTML/Javascript) packaging, deployment
    • First class application on device
    • shares packaging, signing, etc.
    • uses JSDT, XUL runner
    • has proprietary debugging protocol between JavaScript engine and IDE (emulator working, device planned)




Possible common features

  • Possible SDK management
  • Signing
  • Common UI code/Frameworks for common tasks
    • Could possibly be shared from WTP project, which already has abstractions / connectors to server infrastructure

Back to the top