Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "DTP Requirements Council Nov 8 2006"

 
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
**Offline database support, as in WTP/rdb. This is a ''wtp-parity'' item we hope to meet in DTP 1.0.
 
**Offline database support, as in WTP/rdb. This is a ''wtp-parity'' item we hope to meet in DTP 1.0.
 
**Change notification from SQL model. Need ability to filter, and perhaps higher-level event aggregation of model and connection events.
 
**Change notification from SQL model. Need ability to filter, and perhaps higher-level event aggregation of model and connection events.
*Mentioned the
+
*Mentioned the [[Connectivity:Usability | Connectivity UI discussion]] happening now on the Connectivity wiki
 +
*Update on the Visual SQL Query Builder contribution: discussed the need to make the expression editor component generic.

Latest revision as of 17:05, 9 November 2006

Back to DTP Requirements Council

Attendees

  • John Graham
  • Neil Hauge
  • Linda Chan
  • Sheila Sholars

Agenda

  • Collect suggestions/comments for DTP for Europa and beyond
  • Hear from current WTP RDB (Relational Database) component users/extenders about questions/concerns of transitioning to DTP

Minutes

  • Neil provided an update on Dali efforts to use DTP. Specific requests:
    • Offline database support, as in WTP/rdb. This is a wtp-parity item we hope to meet in DTP 1.0.
    • Change notification from SQL model. Need ability to filter, and perhaps higher-level event aggregation of model and connection events.
  • Mentioned the Connectivity UI discussion happening now on the Connectivity wiki
  • Update on the Visual SQL Query Builder contribution: discussed the need to make the expression editor component generic.

Back to the top