Difference between revisions of "Equinox/Meeting Minutes/20120123"

Latest revision as of 11:38, 27 January 2012

Tom expresses the desire to simply move up to Java 5 where generic APIs are defined.
- We could attempt to avoid usage of APIs introduced in Java 5, but the value of doing so seems very low.
- There are concerns that once there is a new embedded vm that supports Java 5 language constructs or higher then we will no longer be able to support them.
- We should cross that bridge if we ever come to it.

Much discussion over the project health
- how to recruit new committers that are concerned about the overall health of the project instead of their own agenda.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Attendees ==
+* Tom
+* Ian
+* John R
 == Agenda ==
 * jsr14 mode and [http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7078419 Java 7 issues]
+* project health
+== JSR14 ==
+* Tom expresses the desire to simply move up to Java 5 where generic APIs are defined.
+** We could attempt to avoid usage of APIs introduced in Java 5, but the value of doing so seems very low.
+** There are concerns that once there is a new embedded vm that supports Java 5 language constructs or higher then we will no longer be able to support them.
+** We should cross that bridge if we ever come to it.
+== Project health ==
+* Much discussion over the project health
+** how to recruit new committers that are concerned about the overall health of the project instead of their own agenda.