Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Linux Tools Project/0.3 Planning Log

overholtopen OProfile bugs:  <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=OProfile&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=OProfile&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=</a><a href="#t2009-04-22T15:02:06" class="time">15:02</a>
overholtopen Valgrind bugs:  <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=Valgrind&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=Valgrind&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=</a><a href="#t2009-04-22T15:02:14" class="time">15:02</a>
overholtproject plan:  <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.linux-distros">http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=technology.linux-distros</a><a href="#t2009-04-22T15:02:23" class="time">15:02</a>
overholtwe have very little in the way of text in the project plan<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:02:38" class="time">15:02</a>
overholtand I need to fix up the bug queries to make them reflect items planned<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:03:33" class="time">15:03</a>
overholtlet's start with you, ksebasti<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:03:39" class="time">15:03</a>
overholtwhat do you plan to do for OProfile?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:03:47" class="time">15:03</a>
overholtwe should collect all items (even long-term ones) in bugzilla<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:03:54" class="time">15:03</a>
overholtthen prioritize per milestone/release<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:04" class="time">15:04</a>
overholtso let's file some<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:06" class="time">15:04</a>
ebaronsounds good<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:11" class="time">15:04</a>
overholtand look at the open ones<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:11" class="time">15:04</a>
ksebastiwell after the user guide im doing now (which i think is looking pretty good :D <a href="http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/OProfile/User_Guide">http://wiki.eclipse.org/Linux_Tools_Project/OProfile/User_Guide</a>)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:22" class="time">15:04</a>
overholt:)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:27" class="time">15:04</a>
overholtand that's bug ~272039<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:44" class="time">15:04</a>
KOS-MOSBug 272039 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272039">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272039</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - All / All - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - Write OProfile plugin user documentation<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:45" class="time">15:04</a>
ksebastii plan to start on ~265794<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:51" class="time">15:04</a>
KOS-MOSBug 265794 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265794">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265794</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / enhancement / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - OProfile: Start/Stop profiling manually or after given duration<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:52" class="time">15:04</a>
overholtokay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:04:57" class="time">15:04</a>
overholtjjohnstn: akurtakov_: others who may be interested:  we'd love to hear your thoughts on these things<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:13" class="time">15:05</a>
overholtcrazy ideas welcome :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:18" class="time">15:05</a>
ksebastibecause i can see it poking in many areas, and would make the plugin much more useful<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:27" class="time">15:05</a>
overholtok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:36" class="time">15:05</a>
ksebastialso add some tests to the launch plugin.. <a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:52" class="time">15:05</a>
overholtokay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:05:57" class="time">15:05</a>
overholtwe can file these bugs afterwards<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:01" class="time">15:06</a>
overholtlet's just talk here<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:04" class="time">15:06</a>
ksebastithey were mysteriously absent :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:04" class="time">15:06</a>
overholtheh<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:15" class="time">15:06</a>
overholtwhat about the hot spot colourization?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:21" class="time">15:06</a>
ksebastiindeed that could probably make it too<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:45" class="time">15:06</a>
overholtokay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:06:54" class="time">15:06</a>
ksebastibecause theres already some code in a branch that didnt make it for 0.2<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:01" class="time">15:07</a>
ksebastibut id rather have it at a lower priority than the start/stop feature<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:18" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtso for 0.3 OProfile we have:  colourize hot spots, write documentation, and make  the profiling manually controllable<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:26" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtso the latter two for sure<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:32" class="time">15:07</a>
ksebastibecause its a nicety rather than a functionality thing<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:35" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtthe first one maybe<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:37" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtokay with me<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:42" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtanyone else have an opinion?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:46" class="time">15:07</a>
ksebastioh the documentation should be done reasonably soon.. its already been a good chunk of days :p<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:07:58" class="time">15:07</a>
overholtok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:12" class="time">15:08</a>
ebaronlooks good to me<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:12" class="time">15:08</a>
jjohnstnoverholt: unfortunately I haven't played with the OProfile plugin to have any meaningful comments....I could review the user doc though<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:14" class="time">15:08</a>
overholtjjohnstn: that's cool.  what about general profiling features you'd liek to see?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:36" class="time">15:08</a>
ksebastialso ~273116 but thats just a small bug which im pretty sure is a 1-2 line fix<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:39" class="time">15:08</a>
KOS-MOSBug 273116 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273116">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273116</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - vmlinux text box not repopulated<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:39" class="time">15:08</a>
overholtwith gprof coming in, we'll have to think about how to make it as general as possible<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:08:54" class="time">15:08</a>
overholtksebasti: ok, we'll leave that targetted at 0.3<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:09:06" class="time">15:09</a>
overholtanything else for OProfile in 0.3?  Early July is the target release date for 0.3.<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:09:57" class="time">15:09</a>
ksebastilater in the cycle when policy kit 1 is out perhaps poke into ~265646<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:10:29" class="time">15:10</a>
KOS-MOSBug 265646 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265646">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265646</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - Find better way to do non-root opcontrol invocation across distros<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:10:29" class="time">15:10</a>
ksebastiand at some point i'd like to clean up (in the most general sense :-) the opxml code for future maintainers<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:11:11" class="time">15:11</a>
ksebastiand see how much of it could perhaps be used from oprofile xml output<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:11:24" class="time">15:11</a>
ksebastiand otherwise poke upstream<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:11:32" class="time">15:11</a>
ksebastiwhoo 0.3 is gonna be fun ;)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:11:50" class="time">15:11</a>
overholt:)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:11:52" class="time">15:11</a>
overholtso realistically we're looking at ~272039, ~273116, and ~265646<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:33" class="time">15:12</a>
KOS-MOSBug 265646 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265646">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265646</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - Find better way to do non-root opcontrol invocation across distros<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:35" class="time">15:12</a>
overholtdocumentation, small vmlinux fix, and start/top daemon<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:52" class="time">15:12</a>
rcjsuenoverholt: Punctuation  bug still in place. ~272039 ~273116<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:54" class="time">15:12</a>
KOS-MOSBug 272039 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272039">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272039</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - All / All - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - Write OProfile plugin user documentation<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:54" class="time">15:12</a>
KOS-MOSBug 273116 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273116">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=273116</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - vmlinux text box not repopulated<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:12:54" class="time">15:12</a>
overholtrcjsuen: thanks<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:02" class="time">15:13</a>
ksebastithats definitely doable<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:30" class="time">15:13</a>
overholtksebasti: when the gprof contribution is cleared by legal we'll have to look at integrating that<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:32" class="time">15:13</a>
overholtokay, great<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:33" class="time">15:13</a>
overholtunless anyone else has thoughts about OProfile, we can move on to Valgrind<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:45" class="time">15:13</a>
ksebastiim inclined to add ~249181 because i expect the first 2 to not take very long<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:48" class="time">15:13</a>
KOS-MOSBug 249181 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249181">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249181</a> - Linux Tools / OProfile / unspecified - PC / Linux - NEW / enhancement / - Assignee: ksebasti@redhat.com - Colourize hot spots in code<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:13:48" class="time">15:13</a>
overholtksebasti: let's try to get it in but not put the milestone on.  and let's leave it until the other things are done<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:14:10" class="time">15:14</a>
ksebastioverholt, righto<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:14:48" class="time">15:14</a>
overholtas usual, if people have bugs or RFEs or whatever, file away<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:14:49" class="time">15:14</a>
overholtthanks, ksebasti<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:14:51" class="time">15:14</a>
overholtebaron: let's move on to Valgrind<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:14:55" class="time">15:14</a>
overholtebaron: <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=Valgrind&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Technology&product=Linux+Tools&component=Valgrind&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=</a><a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:03" class="time">15:15</a>
ebaronoverholt, thanks<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:11" class="time">15:15</a>
ebaronoverholt, ~272198 should be resolved now<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:34" class="time">15:15</a>
overholtebaron: all of those except "Investigate CDT Debug integration" have a target of 0.3.<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:35" class="time">15:15</a>
KOS-MOSBug 272198 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272198">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272198</a> - Linux Tools / Valgrind / unspecified - All / All - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ebaron@redhat.com - Binary for test project does not always get built<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:35" class="time">15:15</a>
overholtebaron: sweet!<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:15:41" class="time">15:15</a>
overholtebaron: is cachegrind mostly done?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:02" class="time">15:16</a>
ebaronoverholt, yes<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:07" class="time">15:16</a>
overholtebaron: what's up next?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:08" class="time">15:16</a>
ebaronoverholt, i was looking into birt charting, but that's more of a callgrind feature<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:31" class="time">15:16</a>
ebaronfor call graphs and such<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:34" class="time">15:16</a>
overholtok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:39" class="time">15:16</a>
ebaronoverholt, so long term, we'll have callgrind and helgrind support<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:16:57" class="time">15:16</a>
overholtokay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:03" class="time">15:17</a>
overholtcould one of them get into 0.3?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:09" class="time">15:17</a>
ebaronoverholt, i feel there are more pressing things to take care of<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:27" class="time">15:17</a>
ebaronoverholt, ~272035<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:37" class="time">15:17</a>
KOS-MOSBug 272035 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272035">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272035</a> - Linux Tools / Valgrind / unspecified - All / All - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ebaron@redhat.com - Guard against segfaults of inferior program<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:38" class="time">15:17</a>
overholtebaron: okay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:52" class="time">15:17</a>
ebaronoverholt, this issue brought the limitations of valgrind's xml output to my attention<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:17:57" class="time">15:17</a>
overholtebaron: alright<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:20" class="time">15:18</a>
ebaroni took a look at how other valgrind GUIs handle errors of this kind<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:21" class="time">15:18</a>
overholtyeah, that'd be interesting<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:27" class="time">15:18</a>
overholtso that + documentation<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:38" class="time">15:18</a>
overholtanything new in Valgrind 3.4.0 that we need to support?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:53" class="time">15:18</a>
ebaronvalgrind actually does have good signal handling, but this does not get reported with XML output<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:53" class="time">15:18</a>
overholtah<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:18:58" class="time">15:18</a>
ebaronoverholt, just a few new options<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:01" class="time">15:19</a>
overholtcould that make 0.3?  or is it a non-issue?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:34" class="time">15:19</a>
ebaronoverholt, i think moving away from xml output would be beneficial<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:38" class="time">15:19</a>
overholtok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:51" class="time">15:19</a>
overholtwill it be as parseable<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:57" class="time">15:19</a>
overholt?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:19:58" class="time">15:19</a>
ebaronoverholt, yeah 3.4.0 options for sure can make it in, i've already implemented the code for version checking<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:20:01" class="time">15:20</a>
overholtsweet<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:20:08" class="time">15:20</a>
ebaronoverholt, it is parseable<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:20:37" class="time">15:20</a>
overholtalright<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:20:42" class="time">15:20</a>
ebaronalleyoop is one example of a GUI that doesn't use the xml output<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:20:53" class="time">15:20</a>
overholtokay.  I guess we should do some smoke testing with galileo stuff for 0.3, too<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:12" class="time">15:21</a>
ebaronvalkyrie, the "official" GUI for valgrind does use xml, but doesn't report segfaults or other kinds of errors<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:22" class="time">15:21</a>
overholtksebasti: that goes for you, too.  we're running builds against galileo deps but doing some smoke tests would be good.<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:25" class="time">15:21</a>
overholtebaron: ok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:32" class="time">15:21</a>
overholtso we can target 0.4 for callgrind or helgrind (whichever comes first)?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:53" class="time">15:21</a>
ebaronoverholt, sure<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:21:58" class="time">15:21</a>
ebaronoverholt, callgrind would come first<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:04" class="time">15:22</a>
overholtand 0.3 for Valgrind can kind of be some further robustification<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:07" class="time">15:22</a>
overholt+ docs + Valgrind 3.4.0 support<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:16" class="time">15:22</a>
overholt+ the fix for ~272198<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:25" class="time">15:22</a>
KOS-MOSBug 272198 - <a href="https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272198">https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=272198</a> - Linux Tools / Valgrind / unspecified - All / All - NEW / normal / - Assignee: ebaron@redhat.com - Binary for test project does not always get built<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:26" class="time">15:22</a>
overholtthat works for me<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:31" class="time">15:22</a>
overholtthen 0.3's work is predictable and you will hopefully have time for 0.4-targeted features<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:49" class="time">15:22</a>
ebaronoverholt, i think it's important since most people use memcheck, i want to ensure it works perfectly<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:22:59" class="time">15:22</a>
overholtagreed<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:23:03" class="time">15:23</a>
overholtI'm going to guess no one else have any opinions<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:23:31" class="time">15:23</a>
jjohnstnI don't<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:23:38" class="time">15:23</a>
overholtokay<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:23:42" class="time">15:23</a>
overholts/have/has<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:23:49" class="time">15:23</a>
overholtI'll post this log somewhere and send the link to the mailing list<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:02" class="time">15:24</a>
overholtpeople may come out of the woodwork with bugs then<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:10" class="time">15:24</a>
overholtI'm sure we'll have bugs filed once 0.2 is out, too<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:21" class="time">15:24</a>
***ksebasti thinks ebaron should add a remix feature to his plugin ;)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:34" class="time">15:24</a>
overholta remix feature?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:48" class="time">15:24</a>
ksebastivirtual turntables and all!<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:51" class="time">15:24</a>
ksebasti</joke> <a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:57" class="time">15:24</a>
overholtah<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:24:59" class="time">15:24</a>
overholtfor sure!<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:02" class="time">15:25</a>
ebaron:D<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:16" class="time">15:25</a>
overholtwell, we're only 30 minutes into our hour.  we could discuss some other sub-projects<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:19" class="time">15:25</a>
overholtjjohnstn: we should file some bugs for your work re-writing the autotools builder<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:31" class="time">15:25</a>
jjohnstnoverholt: ok<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:41" class="time">15:25</a>
overholtakurtakov_: for 0.3 we'll try to ship eclipse-build in some form?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:42" class="time">15:25</a>
overholtjjohnstn: any plans for ChangeLog or libhover in 0.3?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:25:59" class="time">15:25</a>
overholtpmuldoon: I don't know if you're around, but Anithra has been approved as a committer and will likely start working directly in SVN soon<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:26:29" class="time">15:26</a>
akurtakov_overholt: do we require it to produce a working eclipse for the release<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:26:43" class="time">15:26</a>
overholtpmuldoon: we should look at integrating your editor with the rest of the SystemTapGUI stuff<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:26:47" class="time">15:26</a>
overholtakurtakov_: I wonder if that should be the demarcation point where we release it for the first time?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:27:02" class="time">15:27</a>
jjohnstnoverholt: I would like to push libhover C++ and newlib for 0.3...for changelog I would like to take a look at an annoying CTRL+ALT+P bug<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:27:04" class="time">15:27</a>
overholtjjohnstn: okay, sounds good<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:27:16" class="time">15:27</a>
akurtakov_overholt: well, before this point we actually have nothing :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:27:23" class="time">15:27</a>
overholtakurtakov_: do you anticipate that happening in the next 8 weeks?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:27:37" class="time">15:27</a>
akurtakov_overholt: at least a partially working sdk yes <a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:00" class="time">15:28</a>
overholtakurtakov_: okay, well let's aim for that<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:15" class="time">15:28</a>
akurtakov_overholt: i mean builds and starts but don't know what happens after that<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:26" class="time">15:28</a>
akurtakov_:)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:30" class="time">15:28</a>
overholtI'll file bugs for all of this stuff<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:32" class="time">15:28</a>
overholtakurtakov_: sure :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:35" class="time">15:28</a>
overholtakurtakov_: any big plans for .spec editor?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:28:42" class="time">15:28</a>
overholtpeople asked for ability to build RPMs when I presented at EclipseCon<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:06" class="time">15:29</a>
overholtwe should ensure we have bugs filed so people can hop on if they're interested<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:21" class="time">15:29</a>
overholtI'll do a big triage<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:24" class="time">15:29</a>
akurtakov_overholt: using rpmbuild?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:28" class="time">15:29</a>
overholtakurtakov_: yeah<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:31" class="time">15:29</a>
overholton another distro-related note, I'd had a bit of time to look at running the SDK tests against an installed set of packages<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:29:53" class="time">15:29</a>
akurtakov_overholt: i should take a look at the old plugins whether there is smth about building<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:16" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtI'd love to see if we get similar results on another distro -- preferably non-RPM -- but that'll take some coercion I expect :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:21" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtakurtakov_: yeah, we should see if we can use any of that code<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:31" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtakurtakov_: perhaps target 0.4 with some rudimentary RPM building<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:40" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtnot 0.3<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:45" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtif anyone notices, I'm being conservative with estimates here<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:30:58" class="time">15:30</a>
overholtI want our project to be predictable as much as possible<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:31:08" class="time">15:31</a>
overholthopefully that will get us some more contributors<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:31:14" class="time">15:31</a>
overholtor at the very least adopters<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:31:22" class="time">15:31</a>
overholtthe Ericsson guys are going to start work on their tracing stuff soon, I expect<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:31:55" class="time">15:31</a>
overholtthey were talking about it at EclipseCon<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:32:01" class="time">15:32</a>
akurtakov_overholt: i still want to get a form based editor but eclipse-build is taking my time <a href="#t2009-04-22T15:32:01" class="time">15:32</a>
jjohnstnoverholt: was there ever a feature opened to make the rpm spec editor a RCP application?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:32:01" class="time">15:32</a>
overholtakurtakov_: yeah, a form-based editor would be cool<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:32:12" class="time">15:32</a>
overholtjjohnstn: no, but that' s a neat idea<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:32:18" class="time">15:32</a>
overholtI don't think the non-RPM-based distros are ready for something like stubby yet, but it would be neat.  maybe after akurtakov_ & co. have eclipse-build out there, more distros will pick it up<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:33:09" class="time">15:33</a>
overholtthen they'll be at the stage of packaging other plugins<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:33:20" class="time">15:33</a>
overholtI'm going to write a little bit of "getting started" text for people not familiar with Eclipse plugin installation<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:33:56" class="time">15:33</a>
overholtoh, and the gprof contribution is undergoing legal review<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:34:33" class="time">15:34</a>
overholtbut that'll hopefully be finished soon<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:34:45" class="time">15:34</a>
overholtthen Xavier & co. can work in SVN<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:34:56" class="time">15:34</a>
overholtmaybe that can make 0.3, actually<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:00" class="time">15:35</a>
akurtakov_exherbo packaging file is quite similar in structure to spec file<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:03" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtI played around with it<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:03" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtakurtakov_: I'm not familiar with exherbo<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:14" class="time">15:35</a>
akurtakov_so stubby would fit for them nicely<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:15" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtthat's good<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:19" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtthe gprof plugin as it stands opens up gprof output files<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:28" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtI'd love to see a standard way of using various profiling "backends"<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:44" class="time">15:35</a>
overholtksebasti: does post-processing analysis make sense for OProfile?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:35:59" class="time">15:35</a>
ksebastiwhat sort of post processing?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:36:17" class="time">15:36</a>
overholtksebasti: like saving the output in a file or something and then opening it up with an Eclipse view<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:36:30" class="time">15:36</a>
overholtI guess I meant post-execution analysis<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:36:42" class="time">15:36</a>
overholtI guess that's what we do now<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:36:48" class="time">15:36</a>
ksebastithe sample files are generated by oprofile and already there<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:37:02" class="time">15:37</a>
overholtI guess gprof doesn't do that<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:37:10" class="time">15:37</a>
overholtwe'll have to see where things overlap and where they differ<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:37:28" class="time">15:37</a>
overholtI don't really have anything else to talk about<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:37:53" class="time">15:37</a>
overholtour 0.2 release is scheduled for review on May 6th<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:38:00" class="time">15:38</a>
overholtthe slides are done and so's the N&N thanks to everyone<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:38:12" class="time">15:38</a>
overholtour builds are now producing p2 repositories<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:38:26" class="time">15:38</a>
overholtupdates-nightly gets updated automatically with these<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:38:36" class="time">15:38</a>
overholtyou may notice there's no site.xml anymore<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:38:45" class="time">15:38</a>
overholtthat's because p2 repositories use content.jar (which is basically just a zip of content.xml)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:05" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtoh, and we're down to 0 warnings<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:14" class="time">15:39</a>
jjohnstncool<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:20" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtthanks for the work there, jjohnstn<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:20" class="time">15:39</a>
jjohnstnnp<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:27" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtHudson on build.eclipse.org is accessible to all<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:38" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtyou can use your committer username/password to log in<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:51" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtI think I set everyone to have the permission to start builds<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:39:59" class="time">15:39</a>
overholtthey happen automatically every 6 hours<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:40:05" class="time">15:40</a>
overholti think that's all I have to say<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:40:22" class="time">15:40</a>
overholtanyone else?<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:40:25" class="time">15:40</a>
jjohnstnnot me<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:40:39" class="time">15:40</a>
overholtebaron: ksebasti: akurtakov_: you all okay for 0.3?  I'll file bugs and send some follow-up mail<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:01" class="time">15:41</a>
ksebastiall good<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:17" class="time">15:41</a>
overholtgiddy-up<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:22" class="time">15:41</a>
ebaronoverholt, sounds good, i'm sure things will come up, but that's a good start<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:28" class="time">15:41</a>
akurtakov_yep, 0.3 for me is get eclipse-build as much as possible ready :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:28" class="time">15:41</a>
ksebastioverholt, im filing some bugs i just thought of though :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:29" class="time">15:41</a>
overholtksebasti: thanks<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:35" class="time">15:41</a>
overholtakurtakov_: great, looking forward to it!<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:41:44" class="time">15:41</a>
overholtalright, thanks for taking the time to talk, everyone.  next time I'll bill it as a "project meeting" so others may be more interested in attending :)<a href="#t2009-04-22T15:42:02" class="time">15:42</a>

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by <a href="mailto:marius@pov.lt">Marius Gedminas</a> - find it at <a href="http://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/">mg.pov.lt</a>!

Back to the top