Do we ever plan on supporting multiple persistence units? Work on JPA 2.0 Delimited Identifiers could be done in a way that would lend itself to multiple persistence unit support. This would be more difficult, but good if we are supporting multiple PU's in the future.
Can we need to remove the Utility Facet? What are the implications? What is the desired use case for SE and EE scenarios?
Let's talk about this more next week when Paul is back.
M5 planning
Old Topics
Should JPA 2.0 be enabled for Java 1.5 facet?
Metamodel @Generated is a problem in this case, otherwise running in 1.5 shouldn't be a problem.
(Shaun) should just not use @Generated in 1.5 faceted projects, only use in 1.6 - would need to change logic to recognize metamodel without relying on @Generated annotation
(Neil) we should try to support this case unless we determine some technical reason or functional reason why we cannot. Appears to be doable.
What should the preselected Facet configuration be (JPA1.0 or JPA2.0 or calculated(if that is even possible))?
(Shaun) Not completely obvious. Shaun will go back and do some research, but lets default to JEE 6 JPA 2.0 JDK 1.6 for now.
(Shaun) we could also add configuration for JPA 2.0 w/ Java 1.5 and 1.6,
